Jump to content

Why isn't 1 a prime number? Explain.


Recommended Posts

Definition of a prime number, an integer that has no integral factors but itself and 1.

So if 1 divided by itself or 1 is one therefore not 1?

Of course I understand that 1 isn't a prime number but why is it not?

b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

Krakin's Home Dipole Project

http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/186153-krakins-dipole-project-new-reciever-in-rockford-science/#entry2772370

Krakin, are you some sort of mad scientist?

I would have replied earlier, but I was measuring the output of my amp with a yardstick . . .

What you hear is not the air pressure variation in itself

but what has drawn your attention

in the two streams of superimposed air pressure variations at your eardrums

An acoustic event has dimensions of Time, Tone, Loudness and Space

Everyone learns to render the 3-dimensional localization of sound based on the individual shape of their ears,

thus no formula can achieve a definite effect for every listener.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this question interests you, you might look at the history of the primaility of one as described in the papers "What is the smallest prime?" [CX2012] and "The History of the Primality of One: A Selection of Sources" [CRXK2012].

Answer One: By definition of prime!

The definition is as follows.

An integer
greater than one
is called a
prime number
if its only positive divisors (factors) are one and itself.

Clearly one is left out, but this does not really address the question "why?"

Answer Two: Because of the purpose of primes.

The formal notion of primes was introduced by Euclid in his study of perfect numbers (in his "geometry" classic The Elements). Euclid needed to know when an integer n factored into a product of smaller integers (a nontrivially factorization), hence he was interested in those numbers which did not factor. Using the definition above he proved:

The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic Every positive integer greater than one can be written uniquely as a product of primes, with the prime factors in the product written in order of nondecreasing size.

Here we find the most important use of primes: they are the unique building blocks of the multiplicative group of integers. In discussion of warfare you often hear the phrase "divide and conquer." The same principle holds in mathematics. Many of the properties of an integer can be traced back to the properties of its prime divisors, allowing us to divide the problem (literally) into smaller problems. The number one is useless in this regard because a = 1.a = 1.1.a = ... That is, divisibility by one fails to provide us any information about a.

Answer Three: Because one is a unit.

Don't go feeling sorry for one, it is part of an important class of numbers call the units (or divisors of unity). These are the elements (numbers) which have a multiplicative inverse. For example, in the usual integers there are two units {1, -1}. If we expand our purview to include the Gaussian integers {a+bi | a, b are integers}, then we have four units {1, -1, i, -i}. In some number systems there are infinitely many units.

So indeed there was a time that many folks defined one to be a prime, but it is the importance of units in modern mathematics that causes us to be much more careful with the number one (and with primes).

Answer Four: By the Generalized Definition of Prime.

(See also the technical note in The prime Glossary' definition).

There was a time that many folks defined one to be a prime, but it is the importance of units and primes in modern mathematics that causes us to be much more careful with the number one (and with primes). When we only consider the positive integers, the role of one as a unit is blurred with its role as an identity; however, as we look at other number rings (a technical term for systems in which we can add, subtract and multiply), we see that the class of units is of fundamental importance and they must be found before we can even define the notion of a prime. For example, here is how Borevich and Shafarevich define prime number in their classic text "Number Theory:"

An element
p
of the ring D, nonzero
and not a unit
, is called
prime
if it can not be decomposed into factors
p
=
ab
, neither of which is a unit in D.

Sometimes numbers with this property are called irreducible and then the name prime is reserved for those numbers which when they divide a product ab, must divide a or b (these classes are the same for the ordinary integers--but not always in more general systems). Nevertheless, the units are a necessary precursors to the primes, and one falls in the class of units, not primes.

See, for example, the section on factoring primes in A Brief Introduction to Adelic Algebraic Number Theory.

[sharedmedia=garage:vehicles:2223]

CAFForumSig_zps376518ed.jpg?t=1364077982

SD, thank for the input. I would have replied earlier, but I was measuring the output of my amp with a yardstick . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Itself "and" 1 denotes two separate numbers...which makes sense since the actual definition is an integer greater than 1.

Tell me...does this smell like chloroform to you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Itself "and" 1 denotes two separate numbers...which makes sense since the actual definition is an integer greater than 1.

close, watch that video for a great explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of you...

go get a hand job...

lol Kyle you joker you! Don't you know nerds get all the bitches? ;)

On 1/4/2013 at 9:31 PM, HatersGonnaHate said:

Wow. 184 posts and I think you're a fucking asshole.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 202 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...